Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriela Ce vs Kateryna Riabtseva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ce vs Riabtseva analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriela Ce vs Kateryna Riabtseva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ce 1 - 0 Riabtseva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ce has won 43.03% of points on their second serve, while Riabtseva has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ce, in recent form, has won 58.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Riabtseva has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.68% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ce has saved 52.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Riabtseva has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ce has won 43.86% of matches played (W/L 25/ 32), with Riabtseva winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 360/ 263), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Riabtseva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 24% (W/L 7/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Ce has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.73% of matches (W/L 18/ 31), where as Riabtseva has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ce winning 1 times and Riabtseva being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ce winning 2 and Riabtseva winning 0. The last match between Ce and Riabtseva was at the Tunis, 24-04-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Gabriela Ce getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ce and Riabtseva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ce winning 0 times and Riabtseva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ce winning 0, and Riabtseva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ce has played against opponents with an average rank of 245.63 while Riabtseva has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ce has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Riabtseva has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ce has converted 53.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Riabtseva has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
485
Rank
221
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (431-345)
Career Total W/L
21% (7-26)
56% (19-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$26,182
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Gabriela Ce vs Kateryna Riabtseva For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ce VS Riabtseva
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Kateryna Riabtseva |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Kateryna Riabtseva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (19/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (42/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (369/330) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (17/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 135 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217.15 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1707/2360) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (985/1707) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (281/653) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (158/298) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1109/2284) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (12/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (19/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Gabriela Ce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Gabriela Ce
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Gabriela Ce
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anne Schaefer
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Gloria Ceschi
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Gabriela Ce
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Freya Christie
69%
(
85 of
123)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
49%
(
60 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Chiara Girelli
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Gabriela Ce
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Veronika Podrez
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Enola Chiesa
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kateryna Riabtseva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirabelle Njoze
Player
Kateryna Riabtseva
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
25 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Bovy
Player
Kateryna Riabtseva
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Fetecau
Player
Kateryna Riabtseva
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ce Vs Riabtseva Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ce are available here and Riabtseva photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
